
Our Unique Formula to Forecasting Long-Range Weather
ADVERTISEMENT
I have noticed over the last 40 years the weather predictions have become less accurate. Stop using all these climate change data on 30 year averages. Use the old calculation it will be more accurate over time. Weather models have a long way to go to be more accurate than the day. They are no more accurate than looking outside and looking for yourself every morning. Our weather is just now normalizing after the "mini iceage" we had from 1200 to about 1850. The problem is we don't have accurate weather data from prior 1980. The last 30 years we have placed thermometers and satellites to take temps and averages, I know for a fact the thermometers were moved back in the 90's and some more about 2010 because NOAA did not like the temp differences they were seeing. It is all a hoax. IN about 200 years we may have enough data to predict weather but 30 years is nothing, There are 50, 100, 200 500, 1000, etc weather patterns still to come.
I am very curious if weather modification plays into forecasting at all. The Chinese had announced a very ambitious program which leads me to believe there must be some success at this and I wonder if the scale is large enough to affect weather in neighboring areas.
I am a subscriber to the digital almanac. I am trying to update my old farmers almanac app but I cannot figure out how to do it. Any suggestions would be appreciated. BTW whenever a friend is planning a wedding and is worried the weather on their wedding day I always recommend they get an Old Farmer’s Almanac (print or digital). No one has ever complained about my advice, most say it helped making the decision on the wedding day.
I don't believe your claim of 80% accuracy. You are "grading your own paper." Nevertheless, I have been reading the Almanac for many years and continue to do so. It definitely is interesting with a pleasant degree of humor. :{)>
Thank you for writing this article. I am a scientist who studies every aspect of how Geology, Weather, and Space are interconnected. I am certainly interested in working for an organization like yours and continue to gather records to predict a more accurate picture of the annual climate. Thanks for sharing!
I grew up on a farm 30 miles North of Detroit Mich
I have always been very Interested in the Weather
I enjoy reading every thing you Publish
Thank You
I’ve recently developed a self acuired addiction to accruing knowkedge. As nerdy as that sounds, I find myself researching a plethora of different subjects in my free time just to try to gain a glimpse of all the secrets this world holds.
In today’s world, bias and subjectivity taints almost everything you read and hear. Society has become me vs you and simple facts are distorted based on the author or presenters perception. I never take anything at face value and if I’m at all able to I try to figure out the science and raw principles behind why/how something works. I admire the Almanac in its use of data to determine an outcome.
My only question is why would you not make this “formula” available to more people? Of course I see how when readily available, people could abuse and tarnish the reputation of the Almanac by making incorrect predictions, but their is also some disadvantage to the almanac by not having a more broadened analytical base. Two heads are better that one kind of thing. Just a thought, I’ve notived that sometimes my private studies have led me to hit roadblocks that state I need to pay or that I don’t have access to due to secrecy. I hate that about this world. Knowledge is power, but it should be available to all those who seek it. Thanks for your time, and I respect your team’s accuracy and dedication!
I was making a history weather model program based on historical rain patterns versus heat waves. I was looking for data older than 30 years and the exact gps locations of them but they wanted thousands of dollars for this info. The powers to be don't want us to see the weather data for more than 30 years so they can push their climate change propaganda. It is this because they want to remove fossil fuels from our society. Which is not possible and a joke. I have solar and wind power. It is pretty good but not a solution for all areas and climates. All I can say is take your own readings in your area. combine with data that is free and pass it on. The only way we will get the real weather data. Never trust the government when votes are the result.
Thanks for your message. The “formula” is not so much mathematical or otherwise linearly readable; it’s a matter of interpretation. We acknowledge that we use three scientific disciplines in making our weather forecasts: solar science, in particular the sunspots; climatology, the study of prevailing conditions over time; and meteorology, the study of the atmosphere. Our meteorologist “interprets” recent and current solar activity, compares it to similar periods, and considers the various global weather phenomena (e.g., oscillations, jet stream, etc.)—as well as current trends in greenhouse gases—and makes his predictions. He does not make proclamations. We do not expect to be 100% accurate; our historic average is 80% accurate. Others could take the same information (it is public) and come up with different conclusions. We have one meteorologist at a time and we put our trust in him. Two heads are better than one for some matters, but sometimes two leads to three (to break a tie) and before you know it, you’ve got a committee. We’ll stick with our one.
You should remover Climatology from your formulas, it is a hoax. Use what you know and I was taught how to use natures signs to tell us what is going on. The animals and insects will tell you what is happening. My family are farmers so weather has been in our conversations for 100's of years.